Reflection 2

1. How did your overall experience (e.g., lesson preparation, practice, implementation, students’ responses, your realizations, etc.) change from Teach 1 to Teach 2? Your well-written, professional response should be 1-2 paragraphs.

Transitioning from Teach 1 to Teach 2, I have seen myself grow tremendously as a pre service teacher. Teach 1 was successful, but I had many areas to work on. So as I started focusing on this Teach I really put concern on the areas I was critiqued on last time. Spending much time creating and fine tuning my own lesson plan allowed me to really immerse myself in this lesson and what I wanted the students to learn. After breaking down and altering the lesson many times with feedback from different teachers and peers, I finally got where I wanted to be before I entered the classroom. I practiced this time, but with different "students" to help me. Having the different views and questions really helped prepare me for this class. As I entered I was a lot more confident and felt more at ease presenting to the students.

While I was far better prepared for this teach with more confidence, of course things didn't go 100 percent smoothly. Small hiccups in the Teach occurred which I handled at my best. This will definitely happen daily as a teacher in my own classroom. Technology glitches, data not following my predictions, and student misconceptions all occurred in which I had to bounce back quickly. I had to resend my powerpoint and open up the video in youtube, describe how our data would change over time, and reroute students in the right direction of thinking. Overall, I looked at the sheets my students completed and I noticed more students were putting right answers with creative thinking on the Teach 2 worksheets. This does make me feel much more successful.

2. Rate your confidence level as a teacher on a 1 to 5 scale with 1 being terrified and 5 being confident. Elaborate in 3 sentences or less. 

As a teacher, I will go with a 4 on the confidence level. There is still a lot to learn and always will be, but with my experience so far I feel pretty confident that I can teach students a given concept with much more ease.

Sir Ken...

TED Talk: Ken Robinson

Purpose:

Look out folks...an educational reform is occurring. It has been, is, and will be for many to come. In this animation video of TED Talk, Sir Ken Robinson explains the gist of the reform focusing on...

1. Economic reform- How do we educate children to take their role in our ever-changing economy?

2. Cultural reform- How do we educate our children to continue their cultural background and beliefs while being a part of globalization?

Our current education model is not so current and seems to be failing. Built for an earlier time, this model is not challenging students of today's society. He suggests the thought of "changing paradigm."  Let's go in the opposite direction of our education system and break learning down. Can there be many answers to one question?

Question/Problem:

The problem Robinson brings into play is the overall education system itself. 

Raise standards...Raise standards. 

We all have heard that, but really that is common sense. No? The question now is... how  do we raise the standards? Our education model, as previously stated, is based on the time it was created. The cultural and intellectual movement of the Enlightenment paired with the economy of the Industrial Revolution saw rise to the first "fitted" education model...which we are basically still using today. Taxation paid for free education for all.

However times are different and our children are growing up under very different circumstances. So shouldn't our education system fit that? Students use to partake in the system, get the education, and get a job. Today they can get the degree, but that doesn't guarantee a job at all. So what's the point? The children are losing interest.
Inferences/Conclusions:

Robinson points out the methodological and and systematic approach of factory like schooling. We herd kids in and they go through the line. Divided subjects, divided classes. Here is the question. Give the answer. Don't cheat.

It seems the major thing our children have in common is their birth year. Why are we grouping them this way? Students excel at different rates through different ways. We all know that 2 students the same age can be at very different levels. So why build a system on that premise?

Robinson reaches his conclusion that we are hindering each child from reaching their potential because of a failing factory-like system.  The economic imperative and model of the mind has resulted in 2 types of people

1. Smart vs. not smart.

2. Academic vs. on-academic.

Because of this we stop learning. Brilliant people are out there that don't even think they are. There is chaos. We have to reform the way in which we think in order to reform the way in which we learn.

With divergent thinking students can perform on a genius level. Coming up with hundreds of answers to one question, most of these thinkers are found at the kindergarten level. (98%) Thusly, after a few years, around the ages of 8-10 this cuts down to about 50%. So it seems that as the education continues the ideas of thinking freely deteriorate.

Assumptions:

Robinson introduces the modern plagues of ADHD.  

Children are being diagnosed daily with a "fictitious" epidemic. Running wild with ideas and distraction, we must make them focus. To do this we are medicating the "hyper" students with calming medicine. 

In reality, our students are living in the most stimulating times ever know. With technology everywhere, they are being bombarded with information. Instead of taking all of this information and waking the mind of students, we are shutting them down with medications and focusing on one thing at a time. Thus we are making them uninterested and cutting down their learning capacity.

Implications/Consequences:

As a teacher, if I continue to teach the same basic method I will be limiting my students. Even in this class we all stress on getting the right answer and making the grade. But what if there is more than one answer?

We must think on our own and get out of this conformity. Think outside the box.

Relevancy:

As a pre-service teacher, I can take this idea and reform the way I think. The importance is not in the answer but in the question. How do I see it? How can I answer it? Are there even limitations?

Once I get in this mindset I will be able to start challenging my students to as well. 
Comments/Thoughts:

Going away from this, I take one main challenge. We need to think differently of the human capacity. We seem to be limiting ourselves more than challenging our minds. Group thinking , thinking for our surroundings, and thinking from different viewpoints can all affect the way in which we learn.